Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 in review: A lot of computing power in a compact case

019
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALUAcer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0HP 14s-dq1431ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AHHonor Magicbook 14
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQAsus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310ADell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMeLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAverage Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
 Average of class Subnotebook
 Write 4K

102.8

137.66

34%

131 (103 – 145, n=3)

27%

101 (3.23 – 191, n=137)

-2%

Read 4K

45.48

35.06

-23%

167.4

268%

49.8 (45.5 – 52.3, n=3)

9%

62.5 (5.37 – 3738, n=137)

37%

Write Seq

1255

232.1

-82%

2340.76

87%

795.7

-37%

1069 (946 – 1255, n=3)

-15%

936 (37.3 – 2730, n=136)

-25%

Read Seq

1434

2435.95

70%

1396 (1145 – 1608, n=3)

-3%

1186 (142 – 2760, n=136)

-17%

Write 4K Q32T1

441

260.96

-41%

234.7

-47%

370.7

-16%

500 (441 – 592, n=3)

13%

298 (3.6 – 868, n=137)

-32%

Read 4K Q32T1

474.1

335.39

-29%

313.8

-34%

467 (398 – 528, n=3)

-1%

342 (9.66 – 1580, n=137)

-28%

Write Seq Q32T1

1456

967.1

-34%

621.7

-57%

2342.9

61%

842.3

-42%

1887.9

30%

1400 (1364 – 1456, n=3)

-4%

1097 (16.7 – 3007, n=137)

-25%

Read Seq Q32T1

2085

3568.5

71%

3540.2

70%

2226 (2085 – 2301, n=3)

7%

1953 (113 – 3569, n=137)

-6%

Copy Game MB/s

681.1

391.55

-43%

484.81

-29%

843 (681 – 1113, n=3)

24%

330 (10.9 – 1584, n=257)

-52%

Copy Program MB/s

276.17

226.5

-18%

335.41

21%

350.42

27%

424 (276 – 529, n=3)

54%

186 (8.56 – 714, n=257)

-33%

Copy ISO MB/s

981.59

691.96

-30%

716.27

-27%

1133.97

16%

1250 (982 – 1481, n=3)

27%

493 (10.1 – 2761, n=264)

-50%

Score Total

2745

2644 (2545 – 2745, n=3)

-4%

1467 (28 – 5191, n=285)

-47%

Score Write

1108

1031 (968 – 1108, n=3)

-7%

523 (8 – 2379, n=285)

-53%

Score Read

1100

1089 (1072 – 1100, n=3)

-1%

632 (12 – 2339, n=285)

-43%

Access Time Write *

0.032

0.065

-103%

0.045

-41%

0.263

-722%

0.031 (0.025 – 0.036, n=3)

3%

0.818 (0.021 – 30.3, n=348)

-2456%

Access Time Read *

0.065

0.109

-68%

0.075

-15%

0.081

-25%

0.0923 (0.065 – 0.117, n=3)

-42%

0.85 (0.043 – 23, n=341)

-1208%

4K-64 Write

859.2

712.84

-17%

638.44

-26%

482.65

-44%

747.86

-13%

383.45

-55%

1330.25

55%

792 (736 – 859, n=3)

-8%

326 (0.22 – 2105, n=358)

-62%

4K-64 Read

855.34

603.26

-29%

219.59

-74%

606.65

-29%

739.73

-14%

1264.88

48%

1271.04

49%

846 (830 – 855, n=3)

-1%

434 (0.41 – 2011, n=358)

-49%

4K Write

121.59

109.06

-10%

95.71

-21%

80.08

-34%

101.25

-17%

138.94

14%

128 (109 – 152, n=3)

5%

66.4 (0.2 – 180, n=358)

-45%

4K Read

47.13

41.53

-12%

37.03

-21%

37.81

-20%

46.9 (43.7 – 49.9, n=3)

0%

26.8 (0.35 – 63.8, n=358)

-43%

Seq Write

1268.17

931.13

-27%

194.68

-85%

781.17

-38%

775.17

-39%

1755.35

38%

1110 (802 – 1268, n=3)

-12%

553 (14 – 2564, n=359)

-56%

Seq Read

1970

1682.2

-15%

676.97

-66%

1417.21

-28%

1938.67

-2%

1967 (1918 – 2012, n=3)

0%

899 (50.5 – 2980, n=359)

-54%

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.