Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone Review – Inexpensive Stylus Smartphone

0 3
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2185 Points ∼70%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2232 Points ∼72% +2%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2354 Points ∼75% +8%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3120 Points ∼100% +43%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 – 2354, n=9)

2271 Points ∼73% +4%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 – 4057, n=149)

2636 Points ∼84% +21%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

908 Points ∼22%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

897 Points ∼21% -1%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

904 Points ∼22% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4201 Points ∼100% +363%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 – 995, n=9)

923 Points ∼22% +2%

Average of class Smartphone
  (203 – 8783, n=149)

2916 Points ∼69% +221%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1044 Points ∼29%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1035 Points ∼29% -1%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1047 Points ∼29% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3613 Points ∼100% +246%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 – 1140, n=9)

1063 Points ∼29% +2%

Average of class Smartphone
  (253 – 6644, n=149)

2626 Points ∼73% +152%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2369 Points ∼76%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2410 Points ∼77% +2%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2488 Points ∼80% +5%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3120 Points ∼100% +32%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1110 Points ∼36% -53%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 – 2488, n=9)

2359 Points ∼76% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (573 – 5780, n=496)

2175 Points ∼70% -8%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

990 Points ∼21%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

990 Points ∼21% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

988 Points ∼21% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4806 Points ∼100% +385%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

319 Points ∼7% -68%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 – 999, n=9)

988 Points ∼21% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (75 – 9567, n=496)

2075 Points ∼43% +110%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1137 Points ∼26%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1139 Points ∼27% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1151 Points ∼27% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4291 Points ∼100% +277%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

379 Points ∼9% -67%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 – 1151, n=9)

1134 Points ∼26% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (93 – 8204, n=497)

1926 Points ∼45% +69%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2344 Points ∼74%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2399 Points ∼76% +2%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2493 Points ∼79% +6%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3148 Points ∼100% +34%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1112 Points ∼35% -53%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 – 2493, n=9)

2362 Points ∼75% +1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (375 – 5765, n=526)

2085 Points ∼66% -11%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1668 Points ∼42%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1663 Points ∼42% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1678 Points ∼42% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3958 Points ∼100% +137%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

495 Points ∼13% -70%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1653 – 1692, n=9)

1671 Points ∼42% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (70 – 20154, n=526)

2762 Points ∼70% +66%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1782 Points ∼48%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1785 Points ∼48% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1809 Points ∼48% +2%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3744 Points ∼100% +110%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

565 Points ∼15% -68%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1765 – 1810, n=9)

1788 Points ∼48% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (88 – 10699, n=526)

2321 Points ∼62% +30%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2399 Points ∼79%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2468 Points ∼81% +3%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2493 Points ∼82% +4%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3056 Points ∼100% +27%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1172 Points ∼38% -51%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2246 – 2493, n=9)

2422 Points ∼79% +1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (435 – 5209, n=576)

2062 Points ∼67% -14%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

978 Points ∼22%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

927 Points ∼21% -5%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

984 Points ∼22% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4422 Points ∼100% +352%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

89 Points ∼2% -91%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 – 999, n=9)

966 Points ∼22% -1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (53 – 8469, n=576)

1735 Points ∼39% +77%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1126 Points ∼28%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1076 Points ∼27% -4%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1137 Points ∼28% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4022 Points ∼100% +257%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

112 Points ∼3% -90%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 – 1152, n=9)

1116 Points ∼28% -1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (68 – 7323, n=577)

1658 Points ∼41% +47%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2395 Points ∼78%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2412 Points ∼78% +1%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2507 Points ∼81% +5%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3087 Points ∼100% +29%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1172 Points ∼38% -51%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 – 2507, n=9)

2420 Points ∼78% +1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (293 – 5274, n=618)

1924 Points ∼62% -20%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1607 Points ∼29%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1616 Points ∼29% +1%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1626 Points ∼29% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

5586 Points ∼100% +248%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

98 Points ∼2% -94%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 – 1663, n=9)

1622 Points ∼29% +1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (43 – 12494, n=617)

2277 Points ∼41% +42%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1734 Points ∼37%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1744 Points ∼37% +1%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1764 Points ∼37% +2%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

4734 Points ∼100% +173%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

123 Points ∼3% -93%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 – 1795, n=9)

1749 Points ∼37% +1%

Average of class Smartphone
  (55 – 9492, n=620)

1961 Points ∼41% +13%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

23884 Points ∼97%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

19349 Points ∼78% -19%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

24652 Points ∼100% +3%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

10050 Points ∼41% -58%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 – 24652, n=9)

21015 Points ∼85% -12%

Average of class Smartphone
  (735 – 58293, n=766)

15263 Points ∼62% -36%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

24804 Points ∼96%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

24871 Points ∼96% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

25161 Points ∼97% +1%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

9864 Points ∼38% -60%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 – 25219, n=9)

23806 Points ∼92% -4%

Average of class Smartphone
  (536 – 209431, n=764)

25897 Points ∼100% +4%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

24593 Points ∼98%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

23388 Points ∼93% -5%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

25046 Points ∼100% +2%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

9905 Points ∼40% -60%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 – 25046, n=9)

23862 Points ∼95% -3%

Average of class Smartphone
  (662 – 112989, n=764)

20366 Points ∼81% -17%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

5.1 fps ∼30%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

4.4 fps ∼26% -14%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

4.5 fps ∼26% -12%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

17 fps ∼100% +233%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1.3 fps ∼8% -75%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4 – 9.1, n=9)

5.99 fps ∼35% +17%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 – 60, n=288)

11.2 fps ∼66% +120%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2.8 fps ∼25%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2.8 fps ∼25% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2.8 fps ∼25% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

11 fps ∼100% +293%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

0.86 fps ∼8% -69%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 – 2.8, n=9)

2.79 fps ∼25% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 – 101, n=286)

8.07 fps ∼73% +188%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

8.6 fps ∼31%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

7.4 fps ∼26% -14%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

7.6 fps ∼27% -12%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

28 fps ∼100% +226%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

2 fps ∼7% -77%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 – 15, n=9)

9.84 fps ∼35% +14%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 – 60, n=292)

16.6 fps ∼59% +93%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

8.1 fps ∼26%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

8.1 fps ∼26% 0%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

8.1 fps ∼26% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

31 fps ∼100% +283%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

2.3 fps ∼7% -72%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 – 8.4, n=9)

8.14 fps ∼26% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 – 257, n=291)

19.3 fps ∼62% +138%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

7.1 fps ∼24%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

7.1 fps ∼24% 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

29 fps ∼100% +308%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

2.5 fps ∼9% -65%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 – 7.2, n=7)

7.07 fps ∼24% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 – 73, n=465)

14 fps ∼48% +97%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

7.7 fps ∼31%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

6.6 fps ∼26% -14%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

25 fps ∼100% +225%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

2.4 fps ∼10% -69%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6 – 13, n=7)

8.43 fps ∼34% +9%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 – 60, n=469)

12.5 fps ∼50% +62%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1168 Points ∼90%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

935 Points ∼72% -20%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

1300 Points ∼100% +11%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

657 Points ∼51% -44%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 – 1400, n=7)

1117 Points ∼86% -4%

Average of class Smartphone
  (7 – 1745, n=709)

807 Points ∼62% -31%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1907 Points ∼30%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

1931 Points ∼30% +1%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

6444 Points ∼100% +238%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

633 Points ∼10% -67%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 – 1932, n=7)

1907 Points ∼30% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (18 – 16996, n=709)

2428 Points ∼38% +27%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2765 Points ∼97%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2864 Points ∼100% +4%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

2771 Points ∼97% 0%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

778 Points ∼27% -72%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2451 – 3174, n=7)

2811 Points ∼98% +2%

Average of class Smartphone
  (21 – 8874, n=709)

1805 Points ∼63% -35%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

4666 Points ∼82%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

4848 Points ∼85% +4%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

5707 Points ∼100% +22%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

1868 Points ∼33% -60%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 – 5089, n=7)

4827 Points ∼85% +3%

Average of class Smartphone
  (369 – 14189, n=709)

3374 Points ∼59% -28%

Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2315 Points ∼68%

Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096

2238 Points ∼66% -3%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144

3393 Points ∼100% +47%

LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072

882 Points ∼26% -62%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2232 – 2556, n=7)

2308 Points ∼68% 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1 – 6273, n=709)

1716 Points ∼51% -26%

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.